Ofsted inspections - East Midlands
Derby 2005
Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 2; Quality of youth work practice – 2; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 2 (Service described as good and providing good value for money).
Also of interest...
The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).
Derbyshire 2004
Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 2; Quality of youth work practice – 2; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 2 (Service described as good and providing good value for money).
The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).
Leicester City 2005
Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 2; Quality of youth work practice – 3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3 (Service described as adequate and providing adequate value for money).
The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).
Leicestershire 2008
Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 4; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3(Service described as good).
Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:
Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.
Lincolnshire 2007
Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 2(Service described as good and providing good value for money).
Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:
Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.
Northamptonshire 2006
Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 1; Quality of youth work practice –1; Quality of curriculum and resources – 1; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 1(Service described as inadequate and providing poor value for money).
Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:
Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.
Nottingham 2004
(Service described as satisfactory and providing satisfactory value for money).
Nottinghamshire 2008
Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3(Service described as good).
Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:
Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.
Rutland 2006
Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 1; Quality of youth work practice –1; Quality of curriculum and resources – 1; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 2(Service described as inadequate and providing unsatisfactory value for money).
Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:
Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:
Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.
- Bookmark with
Facebook
Reddit
Delicious
Digg
Technorati





