Ofsted inspections - Salford to Trafford

Salford 2005

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 4; Quality of youth work practice - 4; Quality of curriculum and resources - 4; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 4 (Service described as inadequate and providing unsatisfactory value for money).

Also of interest...

The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).

Sandwell 2006

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 2; Quality of youth work practice -2; Quality of curriculum and resources - 2; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 2(Service described as adequate and providing satisfactory value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Sefton 2007

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 2; Quality of youth work practice -2; Quality of curriculum and resources - 2; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 2(Service described as adequate and providing satisfactory value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Sheffield 2006

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 2; Quality of youth work practice -2; Quality of curriculum and resources - 2; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 2(Service described as adequate and providing satisfactory value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Shropshire 2008

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3(Service described as good).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Slough 2005

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 2; Quality of youth work practice -2; Quality of curriculum and resources - 1; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 1(Service described as inadequate and providing unsatisfactory value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Solihull 2008

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3(Service described as good).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Somerset 2007

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 4; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 4(Service described as outstanding and providing good value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

South Gloucestershire 2005

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 2; Quality of youth work practice - 2; Quality of curriculum and resources - 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 3 (Service described as adequate and providing adequate value for money).

The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).

Southampton 2007

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3(Service described as good and providing good value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Southend 2008

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice – 3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3 (Service described as good).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

St Helens 2008

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 2; Quality of youth work practice –2; Quality of curriculum and resources – 2; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 2(Service described as adequate).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Staffordshire 2005

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 3; Quality of youth work practice -3; Quality of curriculum and resources - 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 3(Service described as good and providing good value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Stockport 2006

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 3; Quality of youth work practice -3; Quality of curriculum and resources - 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 2(Service described as good and providing satisfactory value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Stockton on Tees 2008

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3(Service described as good).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Stoke-on-Trent 2006

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 3; Quality of youth work practice -3; Quality of curriculum and resources - 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 3(Service described as good and providing good value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Suffolk 2007

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 2; Quality of youth work practice –2; Quality of curriculum and resources – 2; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 2(Service described as adequate and providing satisfactory value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Sunderland 2004

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 2; Quality of youth work practice - 2; Quality of curriculum and resources - 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 3 (Service described as adequate and providing adequate value for money).

The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).

Surrey Youth Development Service 2005

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 2; Quality of youth work practice - 2; Quality of curriculum and resources - 2; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 2 (Service described as good and providing good value for money).

The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).

Sutton 2005

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 3; Quality of youth work practice - 2; Quality of curriculum and resources - 2; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 2 (Service described as good and providing good value for money).

The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).

Swindon 2005

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 4; Quality of youth work practice - 4; Quality of curriculum and resources - 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 4 (Service described as inadequate and providing unsatisfactory value for money).

The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).

Tameside 2008

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –2; Quality of curriculum and resources – 2; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 2 (Service described as adequate).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Telford and Wrekin 2008

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 3; Quality of youth work practice –3; Quality of curriculum and resources – 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 3 (Service described as good).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Thurrock 2007

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people’s achievement – 1; Quality of youth work practice –1; Quality of curriculum and resources – 1; Strategic and operational leadership and management – 1 (Service described as inadequate and providing unsatisfactory value for money).

Grade 4: A service that delivers well above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 3: A service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for users:

Grade 2: A service that delivers only minimum requirements for users:

Grade 1: A service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.

Torbay 2004

(Service described as unsatisfactory and providing unsatisfactory value for money).

Tower Hamlets 2005

Youth service key aspect grades: Standards of young people's achievement - 3; Quality of youth work practice - 3; Quality of curriculum and resources - 3; Strategic and operational leadership and management - 2 (Service described as adequate and providing satisfactory value for money).

The table above shows overall grades about provision. Inspectors make judgements based on the following scale: Very Good (1), Good (2), Adequate (3) and Inadequate (4).

Trafford 2004

(Service described as good and providing satisfactory value for money).

Back to Ofsted Inspections main page >>





Young Researcher Network website
Youth Work 4 Health
Find out more about Hear By Right and What's Changed
Youth Information